We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Court Document Reveals Scale of NSO's WhatsApp Victims

Court Document Reveals Scale of NSO's WhatsApp Victims
Husain Parvez First published on April 13, 2025 Cybersecurity Researcher

A newly released court document from WhatsApp’s lawsuit against NSO Group has confirmed that 1,223 users across 51 countries were targeted by Pegasus spyware in a two-month attack campaign in 2019. The breakdown, based on internal WhatsApp data, provides the most detailed picture yet of how widely the surveillance tool was used by government bodies.

The data, submitted to a California court, shows the largest number of victims in Mexico (456), followed by India (100), Bahrain (82), Morocco (69), and Pakistan (58. The hacking campaign occurred “between in and around April 2019 and May 2019,” exploiting a vulnerability in WhatsApp that allowed users to be infected through a call — regardless of whether the user picked up or not.

Calcalist reported that NSO earned around $40 million from the operation, with a leaked Meta document showing the spyware enjoying a total revenue of $61.71 million over two years in relation to the WhatsApp breach. Mexico alone reportedly spent over $60 million on NSO products.

However, the presence of victims in countries like Syria, where NSO products cannot be sold due to sanctions, suggests that governments may be using the software to target people outside their territories.

A 2024 forensic analysis by Amnesty International found Pegasus traces on the phones of Indian journalists, while mobile security firm iVerify found “2.5 infected devices per 1,000 scans” in its December 2024 analysis. These findings suggest the threat remains active and underreported.

NSO Group has rejected the lawsuit’s claims and said in a statement that the data represents “information taken out of context” and that “the fact that the phone of a suspect in a crime or terrorist activity is identified in a certain territory does not indicate the identity of the customer.”

About the Author

Husain Parvez is a Cybersecurity Researcher and News Writer at vpnMentor, focusing on VPN reviews, detailed how-to guides, and hands-on tutorials. Husain is also a part of the vpnMentor Cybersecurity News bulletin and loves covering the latest events in cyberspace and data privacy.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

This field must contain more than 50 characters

The field content should not exceed 1000 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address

Accessibility menu
Content Adjustments
Adjust Font Size
100%
Color Adjustments
Tools